On the petrogenesis of lunar troctolites: New insights into cumulate mantle overturn & mantle exposures in impact basins

1,2,3Tabb C.Prissel,1,3,4JulianeGross
Earth and Planetary Science Letters 551, 116531 Link to Article [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2020.116531]
1Lunar & Planetary Institute, Universities Space Research Association, 3600 Bay Area Blvd., Houston, TX 77058, United States
2Astromaterials Research & Exploration Science Division, NASA Johnson Space Center, 2101 NASA Parkway, Houston, TX 77058, United States
3Department of Earth & Planetary Sciences Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, 610 Taylor Road, Piscataway, NJ 08854, United States
4Department of Earth & Planetary Sciences, American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 79th Street, New York, NY 10024, United States
Copyright Elsevier

We investigate lunar troctolite petrogenesis with a series of forward models. We simulate the cumulate mantle overturn hypothesis by modeling the adiabatic ascent and decompression melting of primary mantle cumulates produced during differentiation of a lunar magma ocean (LMO). Combined equilibrium and fractional crystallization of candidate liquids generated by the melting model can reproduce the predominant constituents of the lunar magnesian-suite (Mg-suite: troctolites and norites), contrary to previous hypotheses. Model results are consistent with previous studies challenging the proposed and long-standing genetic relationship between Mg-suite and gabbronorites.
Our Mg-suite petrogenetic model validates a direct temporal and chemical link between Mg-suite melt production and pressure-release melting of primary LMO cumulates. If so, Mg-suite crystallization ages (4345 ± 15 Ma) can be used to constrain the onset and duration of melting associated with mantle overturn. Based on our model results, we propose an alternative mantle overturn hypothesis whereby upwelling olivine-dominated cumulates experience decompression melting to produce the Mg-suite primary melt (∼1.9% melt at ∼2.1 GPa), but that this melt was extracted from depth akin to lunar picritic glass magmas (low-degree partial melts at depths corresponding to ∼1.3–2.5 GPa). Thus, our revised mantle overturn hypothesis reconciles Mg-suite petrogenesis without the expanse of an olivine-dominated upper mantle (as suggested by the current paradigms, but contradicted by orbital data). This hypothesis supports the presence of a low-Ca pyroxene dominated upper mantle, consistent with mantle stratigraphy constrained by experimental and numerical simulations of LMO differentiation and proposed mantle exposures within impact basins.


Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s