A machine learning approach to meteor classification

1,2Samantha Hemmelgarn, 2Nicholas Moskovitz, 3,4Denis Vida
Icarus (in Press) Open Access Link to Article [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2026.117128]
1Department of Astronomy and Planetary Science, Northern Arizona University, 527 S Beaver St, Flagstaff, Flagstaff, AZ, 86011, USA
2Lowell Observatory, 1400 West Mars Hill Road, Flagstaff, AZ, 86001, USA
3Department of Physics and Astronomy, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
4Institute for Earth and Space Exploration, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
Copyright Elsevier

We use machine learning to develop a framework for classifying meteoroids based on 13 directly observed parameters from the Global Meteor Network. This method adds depth to the  parameter, which uses only three parameters. We employ a semi-qualitative approach using 28,177 meteor events observed in 2023 by the Lowell Observatory Cameras for All-Sky Meteor Surveillance (LO-CAMS) network to evaluate multiple normalization, dimensionality-reduction, and clustering algorithms. We find that a combination of Factor Analysis (FA) and a Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM) results in clusters most consistent with traditional models. Three FA-derived factors corresponding to meteoroid kinematics, activation thresholds, and size/geometry effects describe the underlying structure of meteoroid behavior. The activation factor emerged as the most discriminating factor distinguishing whether a meteor is of asteroidal or cometary origin. Resulting 3, 6, and 11 cluster models reveal progressively finer compositional structure, from broad physical regimes to detailed subdivisions within cometary and asteroidal populations. From these results, we introduce a physically motivated hardness classification scheme:  is a data-driven extension of  which physically interprets clusters in terms of the densest iron meteoroids down to the softest cometary material. Application to nine well-studied meteor showers and analysis of clusters in orbital space aids in the physical interpretation of  groups. The  model is supported by an analytical FA–GMM formulation that enables application to future datasets. Our results demonstrate that machine learning methods can extract compositional information from modern optical meteor datasets at scale and offers a new framework for interpreting meteoroid populations.

Discuss