Differentiation and magmatic activity in Vesta evidenced by 26Al-26Mg dating in eucrites and diogenites

1G. Hublet, 1V. Debaille, 2J. Wimpenny, 2Q-Z. Yin
Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta(in Press) Link to Article [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2017.09.005]
1Laboratoire G-Time, Université Libre de Bruxelles, CP 160/02, 50, Av. F.D. Roosevelt, 1050 Brussels, Belgium,
2Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of California at Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA
Copyright Elsevier

The 26Al-26Mg short-lived chronometer has been widely used for dating ancient objects in studying the early Solar System. Here, we use this chronometer to investigate and refine the geological history of the asteroid 4-Vesta. Ten meteorites widely believed to come from Vesta (4 basaltic eucrites, 3 cumulate eucrites and 3 diogenites) and the unique achondrite Asuka 881394 were selected for this study. All samples were analyzed for their δ26Mg∗ and 27Al/24Mg ratios, in order to construct both whole rock and model whole rock isochrons. Mineral separation was performed on 8 of the HED’s in order to obtain internal isochrons. While whole rock Al-Mg analyses of HED’s plot on a regression that could be interpreted as a vestan planetary isochron, internal mineral isochrons indicate a more complex history. Crystallization ages obtained from internal 26Al-26Mg systematic in basaltic eucrites show that Vesta’s upper crust was formed during a short period of magmatic activity at View the MathML source million years (Ma) after Calcium-Aluminum inclusions (after CAI). We also suggest that impact metamorphism and subsequent age resetting could have taken place at the surface of Vesta while 26Al was still extant. Cumulate eucrites crystallized progressively from View the MathML source to >7.25 Ma after CAI. Model ages obtained for both basaltic and cumulate eucrites are similar and suggest that the timing of differentiation of a common eucrite source from a chondritic body can be modelled at View the MathML source Ma after CAI, i.e. contemporaneously from the onset of the basaltic eucritic crust. Based on their cumulate texture, we suggest cumulate eucrites were likely formed deeper in the crust of Vesta. Diogenites have a more complicated history and their 26Al-26Mg systematics show that they likely formed after the complete decay of 26Al and thus are younger than eucrites. This refined chronology for eucrites and diogenites is consistent with a short magma ocean stage on 4-Vesta from which the basaltic eucrites rapidly crystallized. In order to explain the younger age and the complex history of diogenites, we postulate that a second episode of magmatism was possibly triggered by a mantle overturn. We bring a refined chronology of the geological history of Vesta that shows that the asteroid has known a more-complex differentiation than previously thought.

Discuss

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s