1Sierra R. Ramsey,1Piper Irvin,1Arya Udry,2Scott A. Eckley,3,4Amanda Ostwald,5Richard A. Ketcham
Meteoritics & Planetary Science (in Press) Open Access Link to Article [https://doi.org/10.1029/2025JE009220]
1Department of Geoscience, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV, USA
2Amentum, NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX, USA
3Department of Mineral Sciences, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, NW, USA
4Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
5Jackson School of Geosciences, University of Texas, Austin, TX, USA
Published by arrangement with John Wiley & Sons
Nakhlites, clinopyroxene-rich rocks, are the largest single-origin suite of samples from Mars. Despite extensive study to discern their petrogenetic histories, nakhlite emplacement mechanisms and environments are not well-constrained, and it is unknown whether they represent intrusive or extrusive igneous rocks, or a combination. Here, we use X-ray computed microtomography (XCT) and three-dimensional (3D) quantitative textural analyses (e.g., 2D–3D modal abundances, crystal size distributions [CSDs], and petrofabrics) to place additional constraints on nakhlite formation and emplacement. Modal abundances between and within the nakhlites are variable on both a 2D and 3D basis, highlighting the significance of XCT and 3D analyses when studying these samples. All nakhlites in our study have similar crystallization conditions and histories based on 3D CSDs. Cumulus phases (=olivine and pyroxene) crystallized from magma(s) with high nucleation densities, likely related to effective undercooling, and subsequently underwent a period of magma storage. The CSD profiles record evidence for magma recharge events. Pyroxene long-axis orientations in the nakhlites studied here exhibit a magmatic foliation, which likely developed during crystal settling and accumulation in low-to-no flow settings, such as magma chambers, shallow intrusions (e.g., sills and dikes), lava lake or pond infills, or thick lava flows. We also show that the pyroxenitic layer of Theo’s Flow (Canada) may not be an appropriate terrestrial analog for the nakhlites due to differences in emplacement mechanisms and conditions. Our findings suggest that lava flows may be less prevalent in the martian meteorite collection, while intrusive bodies and rocks may be more common than initially thought.
Day: December 3, 2025
Vertical profiling of shock attenuation at the Rochechouart impact structure, France
1P. Struzynska,1S. Alwmark,1C. Alwmark,2M. H. Poelchau,3P. Lambert
Meteoritics & Planetary Science (in Press) Open Access Link to Article [https://doi.org/10.1111/maps.70078]
1Department of Geology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
2Department of Geology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
3CIRIR, Center for International Research and Restitution on Impacts and on Rochechouart, Rochechouart, France
Published by arrangement with John Wiley & Sons
Rochechouart, south-west France, is a complex impact structure. Here, we present the first report of shock barometry of quartz from what are likely parautochthonous basement units at depth, based on samples from the 2017 C.I.R.I.R drilling campaign. The crystallographic orientations of 725 sets of PDFs in 512 quartz grains in samples from four drill cores were measured. We find basal PDFs (Brazil twins) as shear indicators and rhombohedral PDFs recording moderate shock pressures of 10–15 GPa, with numbers of sets per grain ranging from 1.0 to 2.1. A staggering 59.5% of the measured parautochthonous PDF sets are basal PDFs. We find a decrease of shock-metamorphic overprint from 10–15 to 5–10 GPa at site SC16 (Montoume), ~4.5 km south of what is currently held as the apparent crater center. Based on the abundance of low-to-moderate shock pressures and a lack of more highly shocked parautochthonous units, we discuss two well-defined scenarios for this occurrence. Scenario 1 attributes Rochechouart parautochthonous basement target material to have been subjected to at most 15 GPa as per our results. In scenario 2, the drilling only sampled the flanks of the central uplift but not its more strongly shocked center. Our favored hypothesis is the latter, and thus we relate our lack of highly shocked parautochthonous units to a lack of samples from the immediate center of the structure. Finally, based on the extent of PDFs from our shock barometry study of quartz, we estimate the minimum extent for the diameter of the structure to be 24 km.