¹William R. Hyde,^2,3Steven J. Jaret,⁴Gavin G. Kenny,¹Anders Plan,⁵Elias J. Rugen,⁴Martin J. Whitehouse,¹Sanna Alwmark
Meteoritics & Planetary Science (in Press) Open Access Link to Article [https://doi.org/10.1111/maps.70035]
¹Department of Geology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
²Department Physical Sciences, Kingsborough Community College, City University of New York, Brooklyn, New York, USA
³Department Earth and Environmental Sciences, CUNY Graduate Center, New York, New York, USA
⁴Department of Geosciences, Swedish Museum of Natural History, Stockholm, Sweden
⁵Department of Earth Sciences, University College London, London, UK
Published by arrangement with John Wiley & Sons

Secondary ion mass spectrometry U-Pb geochronology has been performed on zircon grains separated from impact melt rock from the 2.7 km-in-diameter Ritland impact structure, southwestern Norway. Scanning electron microscope-based imaging techniques, including electron backscatter diffraction analysis, reveal various zircon grain microtextures, including shock-recrystallization and high-temperature zircon decomposition. Analyses from unshocked zircon grains yield two distinct concordant age populations at 1.5 and ~2.5 Ga, interpreted to represent igneous crystallization ages. The former aligns with Telemarkian magmatism (1.52–1.48 Ga) which dominates the local area of the Sveconorwegian orogeny and the target sequence at Ritland. The latter indicates a more ancient zircon population in Southern Norway, representing detrital grains in cover sediments present at the time of impact in the Cambrian. Collectively, the U-Pb data form two distinct discordant arrays with poorly resolved lower intercept ages spanning the Cambro-Ordovician boundary. The melt rock at Ritland is highly altered, and significant postimpact Pb loss is observed throughout the U-Pb data, likely in response to burial-induced thermal overprinting during the Caledonian orogeny. Post-filtering and selection of the data to minimize the effects of nonimpact-specific Pb loss, the two discordia produce indistinguishable lower intercept ages of 586 ± 73 Ma (MSWD 1.6, n = 15) and 545 ± 48 Ma (MSWD = 11, n = 9) which coincide in the Cambrian–Late Ediacaran. We therefore provide radioisotopic support for previous stratigraphic age constraints for the formation of the structure (500–542 Ma).

¹Lidia Pittarello,¹Stepan M. Chernonozhkin,¹Oscar Marchhart,¹Martin Martschini,¹Silke Merchel,¹Alexander Wieser,¹Frank Vanhaecke,¹Steven Goderis
Meteoritics & Planetary Science (in Press) Link to Article [https://doi.org/10.1111/maps.70030]
¹Naturhistorisches Museum Wien (NHMW), Mineralogisch-Petrographische Abteilung, Vienna, Austria
²Departement für Lithosphärenforschung, Universität Wien, Vienna, Austria
³Atomic & Mass Spectrometry Research Unit, Department of Chemistry, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
⁴Faculty of Physics, Isotope Physics, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
⁵Archeology, Environmental Changes & Geo-Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
Published by arrangement with John Wiley & Sons

Planetary scientists heavily depend on meteorite curation facilities for the preparation and allocation of protected (e.g., Antarctic), highly valuable extraterrestrial specimens. In this work, a fragment of the Dyalpur ureilite obtained from a museum is discussed. The sample is found to contain microstructural, geochemical, and isotopic features inconsistent with any meteorite. The fragment consists of pargasitic amphibole, Ni-sulfides, and chromite grains in Fo₉₂ olivine groundmass, cut by serpentine veins. Amphibole geothermobarometry yields equilibrium conditions that are not compatible with the assumed ureilite parent body. Assuming the fragment represented a rare clast in an ureilite, further analyses were performed. Both the oxygen isotopic composition and the extremely low level of cosmogenic radionuclides confirm the terrestrial origin of the fragment; it is a partially serpentinized peridotite. This work stresses the importance of petrographic characterization of samples used for (isotope) geochemical analyses, of a well-documented sample curation, and of cosmogenic nuclide measurements for the unequivocal identification of extraterrestrial material. Finally, caution is recommended before making sensational claims in cases of anomalous results.