¹Peter J.Mouginis-Mark,²James R.Zimbelman,³David A.Crown,⁴Lionel Wilson,⁵Tracy K.P.Gregg
Geochemisty (Chemie der Erde) (in Press) Link to Article [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemer.2022.125886]
¹Hawai‘i Institute Geophysics and Planetology, University of Hawai‘i, Honolulu, HI 96822, United States of America
²Center for Earth and Planetary Studies, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20560, United States of America
³Planetary Science Institute, Tucson, AZ 85719, United States of America
⁴Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YQ, United Kingdom
⁵Department of Geology, University of Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14260, United States of America
Copyright Elsevier

Much has been discovered about volcanism on Mars over the past fifty years of space exploration. Previous reviews of these discoveries have generally focused on the volcanic constructs (e.g., Olympus Mons and the other volcanoes within the Tharsis and Elysium regions), the analysis of individual lava flows, and how volcanic activity on Mars has evolved over time. Here we focus on attributes of volcanology that have received less attention and build upon characteristics of terrestrial volcanoes to pose new questions to guide future analyses of their Martian equivalents either with existing data sets or with new types of measurements that need to be made. The remarkable lack of exposed dikes at eroded ancient volcanoes attests to an internal structure that is different from terrestrial equivalents. Enigmatic aspects of the origin of the ridged plains (commonly accepted to be volcanic but with few identifiable flow fronts and only rare vents), the style(s) of volcanism during the earliest period of Martian history (the Noachian), and the possible mode(s) of formation of the Medusae Fossae Formation are considered here. Martian meteorites have been dated and are volcanic, but they cannot be correlated with specific geographic areas, or the chronology of Mars derived from the number of superimposed impact craters. Some of these questions about Martian volcanism can be addressed with existing instrumentation, but further progress will most likely rely on the acquisition of new data sets such as high-resolution gravity data, the return of samples from known localities, the flight of a synthetic aperture imaging radar, penetrators sent to the Medusae Fossae Formation, and detailed in situ field observations of selected volcanic sites.

¹Paul G. Lucey et al. (>10)
Geochemistry (Chemie der Erde) 82, 125858 Open Access Link to Article [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemer.2021.125858]
¹University of Hawaii, United States of America
Copyright Elsevier

The Moon is generally depleted in volatile elements and this depletion extends to the surface where the most abundant mineral, anorthite, features <6 ppm H2O. Presumably the other nominally anhydrous minerals that dominate the mineral composition of the global surface—olivine and pyroxene—are similarly depleted in water and other volatiles. Thus the Moon is tabula rasa for the study of volatiles introduced in the wake of its origin. Since the formation of the last major basin (Orientale), volatiles from the solar wind, from impactors of all sizes, and from volatiles expelled from the interior during volcanic eruptions have all interacted with the lunar surface, leaving a volatile record that can be used to understand the processes that enable processing, transport, sequestration, and loss of volatiles from the lunar system. Recent discoveries have shown the lunar system to be complex, featuring emerging recognition of chemistry unanticipated from the Apollo era, confounding issues regarding transport of volatiles to the lunar poles, the role of the lunar regolith as a sink for volatiles, and the potential for active volatile dynamics in the polar cold traps. While much has been learned since the overturn of the “Moon is dry” paradigm by innovative sample and spacecraft measurements, the data point to a more complex lunar volatile environment than is currently perceived.

^1,2Damanveer S.Grewal,¹Johnny D.Seales,¹Rajdeep Dasguptaa
Earth and Planetary Science Letters 598, 117847 Link to Article [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2022.117847]
¹Department of Earth, Environmental, and Planetary Sciences, Rice University, 6100 Main Street, MS 126, Houston, TX 77005, USA
²Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, 1200 E California Blvd, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA
Copyright Elsevier

Protoplanets growing within ∼1 Ma of the Solar System’s formation underwent large-scale melting due to heat released by the decay of 26Al. When the extent of protoplanetary melting approached magma ocean (MO)-like conditions, alloy melts efficiently segregated from the silicates to form metallic cores. The nature of the MO of a differentiating protoplanet, i.e., internal or external MO (IMO or EMO), not only determines the abundances of life-essential volatiles like nitrogen (N) and carbon (C) in its core and mantle reservoirs but also the timing and mechanism of volatile loss. Whether the earliest formed protoplanets had IMOs or EMOs is, however, poorly understood. Here we model equilibrium N and C partitioning between alloy and silicate melts in the absence (IMO) or presence (EMO) of vapor degassed atmospheres. Bulk N and C inventories of the protoplanets during core formation are constrained for IMOs and EMOs by comparing the predicted N and C abundances in the alloy melts from both scenarios with N and C concentrations in the parent cores of magmatic iron meteorites. Our results show that in comparison to EMOs, protoplanets having IMOs satisfy N and C contents of the parent cores with substantially lower amounts of bulk N and C present in the parent body during core formation. As the required bulk N and C contents for IMOs and EMOs are in the sub-chondritic and chondritic range, respectively, N and C fractionation models alone cannot be used to distinguish the prevalence of these two end-member differentiation regimes. A comparison of N and C abundances in chondrites with their peak metamorphic temperatures suggests that protoplanetary interiors could lose a substantial portion of their N and C inventories with increasing degrees of thermal metamorphism. Provided the thermal metamorphism induced-loss of N and C from the protoplanetary interiors prior to the onset of core formation was efficient, the earliest formed protoplanets, as predicted by previous thermo-chemical models, are more likely to have undergone IMO differentiation resulting in the formation of N- and C-poor cores and mantles overlain by N- and C-rich undifferentiated crusts.