¹William Abbey et al. (>10)
Icarus (in Press) Link to Article [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2020.113885]
¹Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, CA 91109, United States of America
Copyright Elsevier

The Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) rover, Curiosity, completed its second Martian year, 1337 sols (1374 Earth days), of operation on May 11, 2016, and its third Martian year, 2006 sols (2061 Earth days), of operation on March 28, 2018. During this time the rover successfully drilled twelve full depth drill holes into the Martian surface and analyzed the recovered material using onboard instruments, giving us new insights into the potential habitability and geologic diversity of ancient Mars. During the second Martian year, four holes were drilled into the mudstones of the Murray formation: ‘Confidence Hills’ (Sol 759), ‘Mojave 2’ (Sol 882), ‘Telegraph Peak’ (908) & ‘Buckskin’ (Sol 1060); while four more holes were drilled into the sandstones of the Stimson formation: ‘Big Sky’ (Sol 1119), ‘Greenhorn’ (Sol 1137), ‘Lubango’ (Sol 1320) & ‘Okoruso’ (Sol 1332). During the third Martian year, four additional holes were drilled into the Murray formation: ‘Oudam’ (Sol 1361), ‘Marimba’ (Sol 1422), ‘Quela’ (Sol 1464) & ‘Sebina’ (Sol 1495). In this paper, we will give a brief overview of the rover sampling hardware and nominal drilling protocols, followed by a discussion of how these protocols were refined and altered early during the course of Curiosity’s second year on Mars. In addition, we will describe the ‘Bonanza King’ (Sol 724) drill campaign, the mission’s first ‘successful failure’, and how it influenced these changes. We will also briefly discuss the events leading up to the drill feed fault on Sol 1536, which resulted in suspension of all drill activities for the remainder of the third Martian year. Finally, we will present scientific highlights obtained from each drill site utilizing MSL’s onboard instrumentation (SAM & CheMin), results enabled by the drill’s ability to excavate sample at depth and transfer it to these instruments.

¹Lidia Pittarello,¹Ludovic Ferrière,¹Jean‐Guillaume Feignon,¹Gordon R. Osinski,¹Christian Koeberl
Meteoritics & Planetary Science (in Press) Link to Article [https://doi.org/10.1111/maps.13490]
¹Natural History Museum Vienna, Burgring 7, A‐1010 Vienna, Austria
²Department of Lithospheric Research, University of Vienna, Althanstrasse 14, A‐1090 Vienna, Austria
Published by arrangement with John Wiley & Sons

Shocked quartz and feldspar grains commonly exhibit planar microstructures, such as planar fractures, planar deformation features, and possibly microtwins, which are considered to have formed by shock metamorphism. Their orientation and frequency are typically reported to be randomly distributed across a sample. The goal of this study is to investigate whether such microstructures are completely random within a given sample, or whether their orientation might also retain information on the direction of the local shock wave propagation. For this work, we selected samples of shatter cones, which were cut normal to the striated surface and the striation direction, from three impact structures (Keurusselkä, Finland, and Charlevoix and Manicouagan, Canada). These samples show different stages of pre‐impact tectonic deformation. Additionally, we investigated several shocked granite samples, selected at different depths along the drill core recovered during the joint IODP‐ICDP Chicxulub Expedition 364 (Mexico). In this case, thin sections were cut along two orthogonal directions, one parallel and one normal to the drill core axis. All the results refer to optical microscopy and universal‐stage analyses performed on petrographic thin sections. Our results show that such shock‐related microstructures do have a preferred orientation, but also that relating their orientation with the possible shock wave propagation is quite challenging and potentially impossible. This is largely due to the lack of dedicated experiments to provide a key to interpret the observed preferred orientation and to the lack of information on postimpact orientation modifications, especially in the case of the drill core samples.