Porosity Effects on Crystallization Kinetics of Amorphous Solid Water: Implications for Cold Icy Objects in the Outer Solar System

aEmily H. Mitchell, bUjjwal Rautb, bBenjamin D. Teolis, aRaúl A. Baragiola
Icarus (in Press) Link to Article [http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2016.11.004]

aLaboratory for Astrophysics and Surface Physics, Thornton Hall B 113, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904
bSouthwest Research Institute, Space Science and Engineering Division, 6220 Culebra Road, San Antonio, TX 78238
Copyright Elsevier

We have investigated the effects of porosity on the crystallization kinetics of amorphous solid water (ASW). Porosity in ASW films, condensed from the vapor phase at varying incidences at 10 K, was characterized using ultraviolet-visible interferometry and quartz crystal microgravimetry. The films were heated to crystallization temperatures between 130 and 141 K, resulting in partial pore compaction. The isothermal phase transformation was characterized using transmission infrared spectroscopy to monitor the time evolution of the 3.1-µm O-H stretch absorption band. We find that ASW crystallization unfolds in two distinct stages. The first stage, responsible for ∼10% transformation, is initiated from nucleation at the external surface. The dominant second stage begins with nucleation at the internal pore surfaces and completes the transformation of the film at a faster rate compared to the first stage. A key finding is that porosity has major influence on crystallization kinetics; a film with five-times-higher porosity was observed to crystallize ∼15 times faster, compared to the less porous counterpart. We extrapolate our results to predict crystallization times for amorphous ices condensed on Europa’s surface from plume sources, as recently observed by the Hubble Space Telescope.

Classification scheme for sedimentary and igneous rocks in Gale crater, Mars

aN. Mangold (>10)*
Icarus (in Press) Link to Article [http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2016.11.005]

a LPG-Nantes, CNRS/Université Nantes, 44322 Nantes, France
*Find the extensive, full author and affiliation list on the publishers website
Copyright Elsevier

Rocks analyzed by the Curiosity rover in Gale crater include a variety of clastic sedimentary rocks and igneous float rocks transported by fluvial and impact processes. To facilitate the discussion of the range of lithologies, we present in this article a petrological classification framework adapting terrestrial classification schemes to Mars compositions (such as Fe abundances typically higher than for comparable lithologies on Earth), to specific Curiosity observations (such as common alkali-rich rocks), and to the capabilities of the rover instruments. Mineralogy was acquired only locally for a few drilled rocks, and so it does not suffice as a systematic classification tool, in contrast to classical terrestrial rock classification. The core of this classification involves (1) the characterization of rock texture as sedimentary, igneous or undefined according to grain/crystal sizes and shapes using imaging from the ChemCam Remote Micro-Imager (RMI), Mars Hand Lens Imager (MAHLI) and Mastcam instruments, and (2) the assignment of geochemical modifiers based on the abundances of Fe, Si, alkali, and S determined by the Alpha Particle X-ray Spectrometer (APXS) and ChemCam instruments. The aims are to help understand Gale crater geology by highlighting the various categories of rocks analyzed by the rover. Several implications are proposed from the cross-comparisons of rocks of various texture and composition, for instance between in place outcrops and float rocks. All outcrops analyzed by the rover are sedimentary; no igneous outcrops have been observed. However, some igneous rocks are clasts in conglomerates, suggesting that part of them are derived from the crater rim. The compositions of in-place sedimentary rocks contrast significantly with the compositions of igneous float rocks. While some of the differences between sedimentary rocks and igneous floats may be related to physical sorting and diagenesis of the sediments, some of the sedimentary rocks (e.g., potassic rocks) cannot be paired with any igneous rocks analyzed so far. In contrast, many float rocks, which cannot be classified from their poorly defined texture, plot on chemistry diagrams close to float rocks defined as igneous from their textures, potentially constraining their nature.