1G.J. Consolmagno,2,3G.J. Golabek,4D. Turrini,5M. Jutzi,6S. Sirono,7V. Svetsov, 8K. Tsiganis
1Specola Vaticana, V-00120, Vatican City State
2Institute of Geophysics, ETH Zurich, Sonneggstrasse 5, CH-8092 Zürich, Switzerland
3Bayerisches Geoinstitut, University of Bayreuth, D-95440 Bayreuth, Germany
4Istituto di Astrofisica e Planetologia Spaziali INAF-IAPS, Via Fosso del Cavaliere 100, 00133 Rome, Italy
5Physics Institute, Space Research and Planetary Sciences, Center for Space and Habitability, University of Bern, Sidlerstrasse 5, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland
6Earth and Environmental Sciences, Nagoya University, Tikusa-ku, Furo-cho, Nagoya 464-8601 Japan
7Institute for Dynamics of Geospheres, Leninskiy Prospekt 38-1, Moscow, Russia
8Unit of Mechanics, Section of Astrophysics, Astronomy & Mechanics, Department of Physics, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, GR 54 124 Thessaloniki, Greece
It is difficult to find a Vesta model of iron core, pyroxene and olivine-rich mantle, and HED crust that can match the joint constraints of (a) Vesta’s density and core size as reported by the Dawn spacecraft team; (b) the chemical trends of the HED meteorites, including the depletion of sodium, the FeO abundance, and the trace element enrichments; and (c) the absence of exposed mantle material on Vesta’s surface, among Vestoid asteroids, or in our collection of basaltic meteorites. These conclusions are based entirely on mass-balance and density arguments, independent of any particular formation scenario for the HED meteorites themselves. We suggest that Vesta either formed from source material with non-chondritic composition or underwent after its formation a radical physical alteration, possibly caused by collisional processes, that affected its global composition and interior structure.
Reference
Consolmagno GJ, Golabek GJ, Turrini D, Jutzi M, Sirono S, Svetsov V, Tsiganis K (2015) Is Vesta an Intact and Pristine Protoplanet? Icarus (in Press)
Link im Article [doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2015.03.029]
Copyright Elsevier